HOME | ABOUT US | PLC TECNOLOGY | PRODUCTS & SOLUTIONS CASE STUDIES | DOWNLOADS | NEWS | CONTACT US

:: SPANISH

 
SPEED TEST | MY IP
 
 
 
 
 

Ten Greatest Myths about IP-Surveillance

 
There are a number of myths, large and small, surrounding IP-Surveillance technology. We’ve taken the 10 most often-heard myths and organized them into two categories: general and technical. We’ll take the general un-truths first and then launch into some of the technical misperceptions
 
Myth #7: Transferring all that video data over my network will overload it, making this an unworkable technology.
 

Reality: If you will only have a few cameras, then an existing Fast Ethernet (100 Mbit) office network will normally meet any transmission demands. For comparison, a typical single network camera video feed is 0.2 to 2.0 Mbit/second depending on compression, size and frame rate. For any larger deployment of network cameras and video servers, we recommend a separate network for the video. Think of it like rail transportation—once the existing track becomes too congested, you simply build another set of tracks. For enterprise size, your local network core would probably be running at Gigabit Ethernet. With today’s network switches and routers, separating networks is easy. In addition, other specific steps can be taken to ensure that IP-Surveillance technology can be integrated into an organization’s operations and will not tax the network.

Additionally, because of the local intelligence inside a network camera, the camera can actually decide which frame rate to send over the network based on events, motion, time of day, etc. So in many cases the camera will only send video over the network if the video is worth recording, which might only be 10% of the time. 90% of the time nothing is being transferred over the network.
 

 << BACK
 
 
 
:: CUSTOMER ACCESS

USER NAME:

 

PASSWORD:

     
 
 

 © EkoPLC | Copyright 2008 -  All rights reserved  | Spanish